M38A1Jeep.us – A non-profit initiative to provide education, support and post traumatic stress help to military soldiers and their families. Through K-9 Disaster Relief, a non-profit humanitarian organization, it brings to bear the services needed for mental health programs and the canine human-animal-bond of uniting PTSD service dogs with veterans. www.M38A1Jeep.us – @M38A1Jeep – www.K-9DisasterRelief.org
The annual Veterans Day Parade, produced by United War Veterans Council, is the largest celebration of service in the nation. The tradition of honoring veterans on November 11 began in 1919, following WWI. Today, veterans, military personal, high school and college bands, military vehicle preservation associations and humanitarian organizations like K-9 Disaster Relief – M38A1Jeep.us participate.
According to Frank Shane, Executive Director of K-9 Disaster Relief, who restored the vintage 1962 Vietnam War Jeep – “It was an honor to be part of the Parade. The M38A1 Jeep brings to light the psychological traumatic stress services, both human and canine, that are available to soldiers who have bravely served.”
Special Recognition: United War Veterans Council (UWVC) – Dan McSweeney & Jeff Swansen, FDNY Battalion Chief, Michael Kirwin, FDNY House 10, NYPD, MIL-SPEC, Robert Rubino
The approximate percentage of Vietnam-era veterans who are still alive is 75.
Some online estimates suggest that the number is much more stark: Only one-third of Vietnam veterans are still alive, these Web sites say, and the survivors are going fast.
But as Patrick S. Brady made clear in an article for The VVA Veteran, the magazine of the Vietnam Veterans of America, the reality is more reassuring. The rumor illustrates the danger of using incompatible numbers from different sources.
It was apparently based on an estimate that 800,000 Vietnam-era veterans had died by 2000. That number was reasonable: About 9.2 million Americans served in the military during the Vietnam era (1964-75), so that would mean about 8 percent of them had died and 92 percent were still alive.
The problem arose when someone applied the 800,000 figure to a different denominator: 2.7 million, the estimated number of veterans who actually served in Vietnam, rather than at home or in some other theater. This made it appear that nearly one-third of those veterans were dead in 2000 and that they were dying at a rate of almost 400 a day. That would have meant more than 100,000 deaths a year, or nearly two million between 2000 and 2015 — a path to near-total disappearance.
In reality, the death rate for Vietnam-era veterans in recent years has been comparable to or lower than that of other men in their age group, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Of the men with the age distribution of Vietnam-era veterans who were alive in 2000, about 12 percent had died by 2010, with about 1.5 percent of the survivors projected to die each year since then.
This Blog is about my 1962 Vietnam War M38A1 Jeep. My AIT medical corps training was at Fort Sam Houston, Texas – Class 46 – Company C – 2nd Bn. Basic at Fort Ord and AIT/Medic, Fort Sam Houston. My M38A1 is a way to connect with soldiers, veteran families and military organizations.
M38A1 WITH HUEY UH-1 MediVac ‘slick” chopper
The best day for me is when a veteran family member or child rides in my Jeep wearing my Nam field jacket or helmet (much too large for their head) asking questions about the war or relating stories as told to them by their dad or grandfather. A wife or loved one will start talking . . . a short Jeep ride is restorative and forms a common bond
Model: M38A1
Year: 1962
Manufactured: Kaiser Willys, Toledo, Ohio Vehicle Identification:: USMC 94 69385
Military: United States Marine Corps
Military Service Era: Vietnam War Data Plate: 57148 88968
Willys M38A1 Data Credit M38A1.com
Years Produced: 1952-1957
No of Units: 101,488 (80,290 domestic use / 21,198 foreign sales)
This was the first appearance of the ’round-fender’ Jeep that would eventually become the CJ5. The M38A1 was quite different that the CJ5, having a stronger chassis and reversed front spring shackles, in addition to the military accoutrements such as standardized GI instruments and a 24 volt electrical system. The M38A1 lasted quite awhile in military service. Even after it was replaced by the high-tech Ford M151, they could be seen in OD green as late as the 1970s. In all, 101,488 units were produced, some of which went for export. This rig is owned by George Baxter at Army Jeep Parts in Bristol, PA.
(George Baxter – Data Credit M38A1.com)
The United States Marine Corp. after WWII knew it had specific requirements and concerns to be addressed brought about by the environments and conditions encountered from the Pacific and other theaters of operation. In particular, they recognized the need for rust protection and further under extreme tropical wet conditions (Burma, Indochina, and the Marianas) the need for locking differentials.
They also formulated a firm doctrine that was heretofore only expressed as a “guideline” and that was the use of minimal markings as such “obvious” displays of large identification and recognition may well lead to more casualties than it avoids. Now if one does any research with USMC Motor pool Veterans of the period you quickly hear of field expedients and makeshift modifications designed to address the issues at Pool (or even Field) level.
These field expedient modifications were varied and typically difficult to document. Although I have collected a broad database of the modifications they won’t be discussed in detail here. One first must understand that the evolution of the “Truck ¼ ton” that was used by all branches is a fairly simple path to follow but when looked at in a more detailed perspective the evolution and models become a little fuzzier. From the Navy beach modifications of the MB to the Air Force requirements of the M151 there were often modifications that lead to the standardization of the modifications up to the complete redesign of the subsequent model. Thus it lead some branches feeling a little less enthusiastic about the “new” improved version if it didn’t meet their “needs”. This is exactly why the USMC placed an NSN supply request in the early 1960’s with Kaiser to continue to produce for them exclusively the USMC M38A1. They quite simply were “unimpressed” with the new standard m151 and had such outstanding service from the A1 in Korea and afterwards that a bold decision was made and surprisingly accepted to allow the order to be fulfilled (which actually the full order wasn’t). Many have told the story of the USMC testing the M151 and finding its “handling” to be subpar. While the testing was in fact done and the Corp. had specific problems and reservations, the reality is that it was more due to the success & fondness for their A1’s that was the motivating factor.
Scott Gray spoke with numerous USMC (and other) users over the past years and almost invariably all said that the M38A1 was perhaps the best utility vehicle ever assigned the services and many of these men had experience with all four (MB thorough the M151). He also spoke with one particular USMC motor pool sergeant (ret. Msgt. Vernon Pike ) who spent the better part of Korea (in country) and the years following maintaining the M38A1 and perhaps Msgt Pike said it best. “When the situation involved harsh terrain or severe conditions . . . those damn things were unstoppable”.
Willys Mfr. USMC differences – 1952 to 1957
These early M38A1’s was typically requisitioned directly from US Army stores and as such not made specifically for the USMC.
There is still debate whether the time period from 1955-1957 there was a contract but I have found no record to date. It does seem that the examples seen this late have “signs” of original USMC paint and modifications but the sample size doesn’t allow a firm conclusion to be made. It can for the most part be assumed that the modifications to USMC spec were done either/both at main Depot level (i.e. Toelle, Letterkenny, etc.) or at division level. Also its very important to remember that although the following differences are usually found there are numerous examples known to be original that don’t have all the same modifications.
1- Undercoating to include floor bottom, frame exterior, hood underside and firewall bottom. (approximately 60-70% of those documented)
2- Reinforced rear bumper not less than 3/16 plate attached and welded to provide support and rigidity for lift ring relocation.
3- HD lift rings front and HD lift rings relocated in rear to allow easier access for off shore and loading mobility (almost always found on USMC’s)
4- Limited slip differential (this one is really hit or miss but seems to be common on those vehicles late in this production run and sometimes found only be in the rear axle)
5- Sealed bell crank for clutch (are true rarity but ONLY seen on USMC vehicles)
6- USMC 34052 forest green paint and flat yellow numbering on hood ONLY.
There were also little or no other markings (stars, etc.) on USMC vehicles.
Kaiser Mfr. USMC differences 1960-1967
These were the actual USMC contract trucks that were delivered specifically to the Marine Corp (and a few Naval vehicles).
Photo Credit: Frank Shane
All of the same modifications as the early A1’s was implemented plus you will often see the typical Kaiser differences (front fender and battery box changes). Then in approximately 1962/63 you begin seeing what may have been the typical supply superseding of obsolete parts and the use of hybrid items on the contract A1’s. I have seen numerous late USMC A1’s with non-YS carbs that are more like the late non- waterproof XE series. You will often see late in the contract the use of a different air cleaner assembly, similar to the ones being used on the 151 series.
According to the information as provided by Scott Gary in this article, he said . . .
“I’d like to thank those who have contributed data and invaluable info over the years including Jerry Sinclair, Robert Bues, Joe “Greasy” Krupp, Harold West, George Baxter, and all the others I don’t have space to thank. The info and study isn’t even close to complete and only by scouring the Mil salvage yards down south or the Depot records still existing will we learn more about the USMC’s use of the A1. These rare variants – – easily less than 10%”
Article Credits and Copyright:Scott Graywith Combat Restorations
Spec. Overview (Courtesy Scott Gray – COMBAT RESTORATIONS – Reprint MVPA – M38A1 RESTORATION SITE) – – Their site was created for the benefit of all M38A1 owners to promote the exchange of information for the M38A1 series vehicle. For articles and information fourths interested in restoring or maintaining the Willys-Overland MD series vehicle, also known as the M38A1, visit The M38A1 Restoration Site
"Jeep™" is a registered trademark of the Daimler-Chrysler Corporation. Article Credits and Copyright:Scott Graywith Combat Restorations.
